Review

cjun 60a8 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)

Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier

Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

Cell Signaling Technology Inc cjun 60a8

(A) Growth in low attachment assay of isogenic SALE cells expressing RIT1 M90I and YAP1 8SA alone or in combination analyzed by CellTiterGlo. Data shown are the mean ± SD of 14–16 technical replicates. (B) Heatmap of gene expression data derived from bulk RNA-seq of isogenic SALE cells. Each row is a differentially expressed gene, and each column is a replicate of the cell line variant indicated. The top 100 up- and downregulated genes distinguishing combined RIT1 M90I /YAP1 8SA (RY) cells from YAP1 8SA cells were determined by marker selection based on the mean difference of RY replicates compared to YAP1 8SA replicates and then genes and samples were clustered using one minus Pearson correlation. (C) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq in SALE-RY cells versus parental SALE cells. p values shown were calculated by t tests of three biological replicates per cell line. Multiple hypothesis testing was performed using the false discovery rate (FDR) method. Red points: log 2 fold change (log 2 FC) > 1.5, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.1; blue points: log 2 FC < −1.5, FDR < 0.1. (D) MSigDB overlap analysis of up- and downregulated genes from RNA-seq in RY cells compared to parental. The FDR is the false discovery rate analog of the hypergeometic p value after correction for multiple hypothesis testing. (E) Motif analysis of up- and downregulated genes from (C) using the MSigDB Transcription Factor Target (TFT) gene set. AP-1 and ZEB1 (AREB6) motifs are shown in bold. FDR was calculated as in (D). (F) Western blot of isogenic SALE cells using antibodies against RIT1 and AP-1 transcription factors <t>cJUN</t> and FOSL1/FRA1. Vinculin is used as a loading control. (G) Quantification of biological replicates ( n = 3) of cJUN abundance determined by western blot, normalized to loading control and parental cJUN abundance. Data shown are mean ± SEM. P, parental; R, RIT1 M90I ; Y, YAP1 8SA ; RY, RIT1 M90I/ YAP1 8SA . (H) Quantification of biological replicates ( n = 3) of FRA1 abundance determined by western blot, normalized to loading control and parental FRA1 abundance. Data shown are mean ± SEM. Labeling as in (G). See also and . ns, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed t test.

Cjun 60a8, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1004 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cjun 60a8/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1004 article reviews

cjun 60a8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04

96/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Mutant RIT1 cooperates with YAP to drive an EMT-like lung cancer state"

Article Title: Mutant RIT1 cooperates with YAP to drive an EMT-like lung cancer state

Journal: Cell reports

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116185

Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Growth in low attachment assay of isogenic SALE cells expressing RIT1 M90I and YAP1 8SA alone or in combination analyzed by CellTiterGlo. Data shown are the mean ± SD of 14–16 technical replicates. (B) Heatmap of gene expression data derived from bulk RNA-seq of isogenic SALE cells. Each row is a differentially expressed gene, and each column is a replicate of the cell line variant indicated. The top 100 up- and downregulated genes distinguishing combined RIT1 M90I /YAP1 8SA (RY) cells from YAP1 8SA cells were determined by marker selection based on the mean difference of RY replicates compared to YAP1 8SA replicates and then genes and samples were clustered using one minus Pearson correlation. (C) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq in SALE-RY cells versus parental SALE cells. p values shown were calculated by t tests of three biological replicates per cell line. Multiple hypothesis testing was performed using the false discovery rate (FDR) method. Red points: log 2 fold change (log 2 FC) > 1.5, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.1; blue points: log 2 FC < −1.5, FDR < 0.1. (D) MSigDB overlap analysis of up- and downregulated genes from RNA-seq in RY cells compared to parental. The FDR is the false discovery rate analog of the hypergeometic p value after correction for multiple hypothesis testing. (E) Motif analysis of up- and downregulated genes from (C) using the MSigDB Transcription Factor Target (TFT) gene set. AP-1 and ZEB1 (AREB6) motifs are shown in bold. FDR was calculated as in (D). (F) Western blot of isogenic SALE cells using antibodies against RIT1 and AP-1 transcription factors cJUN and FOSL1/FRA1. Vinculin is used as a loading control. (G) Quantification of biological replicates ( n = 3) of cJUN abundance determined by western blot, normalized to loading control and parental cJUN abundance. Data shown are mean ± SEM. P, parental; R, RIT1 M90I ; Y, YAP1 8SA ; RY, RIT1 M90I/ YAP1 8SA . (H) Quantification of biological replicates ( n = 3) of FRA1 abundance determined by western blot, normalized to loading control and parental FRA1 abundance. Data shown are mean ± SEM. Labeling as in (G). See also and . ns, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed t test.

Techniques Used: Expressing, Gene Expression, Derivative Assay, RNA Sequencing, Variant Assay, Marker, Selection, Western Blot, Control, Labeling, Two Tailed Test

(A) Immunofluorescence and confocal images of SALE cells fixed and stained with anti-YAP and anti-cJUN antibodies and counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. Inset, 50 μm. (B) Quantification of nuclear YAP fluorescence intensity determined by confocal microscopy. Data shown are mean ± SEM of four biological replicates. P, parental; R, RIT1 M90I ; Y, YAP1 8SA ; RY, RIT1 M90I /YAP1 8SA (C) Quantification of nuclear cJUN fluorescence intensity determined by confocal microscopy. Data shown are mean ± SEM of four biological replicates. Labeling as in (B). (D) Dual p-AP1 luciferase reporter assay in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with control vectors (V), RIT1 M90I (R), or YAP1 WT and YAP1 8SA in the presence or absence of RIT1 M90I . p-RL renilla luciferase was co-transfected and used for normalization. PMA was used as a positive control. Data shown are mean ± SEM of 3 technical replicates. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. (E) Western blot of SALE-RY cells showing doxycycline-regulated induction of cJUN or a dominant-negative cJUN (TAM67). (F) In vivo xenograft tumor growth on doxycycline of the cells shown in (E). Data shown are mean ± SEM of 8–10 tumors per group. * P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA. (G) Tumor weights of tumors shown in (F). Data shown are mean ± SEM. The cJUN wild-type group was not analyzed due to early euthanasia for tumor ulceration. ns, not significant; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed t test unless otherwise specified. See also .

Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Immunofluorescence and confocal images of SALE cells fixed and stained with anti-YAP and anti-cJUN antibodies and counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. Inset, 50 μm. (B) Quantification of nuclear YAP fluorescence intensity determined by confocal microscopy. Data shown are mean ± SEM of four biological replicates. P, parental; R, RIT1 M90I ; Y, YAP1 8SA ; RY, RIT1 M90I /YAP1 8SA (C) Quantification of nuclear cJUN fluorescence intensity determined by confocal microscopy. Data shown are mean ± SEM of four biological replicates. Labeling as in (B). (D) Dual p-AP1 luciferase reporter assay in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with control vectors (V), RIT1 M90I (R), or YAP1 WT and YAP1 8SA in the presence or absence of RIT1 M90I . p-RL renilla luciferase was co-transfected and used for normalization. PMA was used as a positive control. Data shown are mean ± SEM of 3 technical replicates. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. (E) Western blot of SALE-RY cells showing doxycycline-regulated induction of cJUN or a dominant-negative cJUN (TAM67). (F) In vivo xenograft tumor growth on doxycycline of the cells shown in (E). Data shown are mean ± SEM of 8–10 tumors per group. * P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA. (G) Tumor weights of tumors shown in (F). Data shown are mean ± SEM. The cJUN wild-type group was not analyzed due to early euthanasia for tumor ulceration. ns, not significant; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed t test unless otherwise specified. See also .

Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence, Confocal Microscopy, Labeling, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Transfection, Control, Positive Control, Western Blot, Dominant Negative Mutation, In Vivo, Two Tailed Test

(A) Western blot confirmation of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown of RIT1, Yap, and cJun. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) Cell proliferation analysis using Incucyte imaging of S-RPN-1 cells with stable knockdown of each gene using the shRNAs indicated. Data shown are the mean ± SEM of three independent transductions. (C) Western blot of Zeb1 expression in S-RPN-1 cells with or without cJun knockdown. Actin was used as a loading control. (D) Western blot quantification of Zeb1 expression in cells after cJun knockdown. Data shown are mean ± SEM of three biological replicates. *, p < 0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t test. (E) Growth-in-low-attachment assay of SALE-RY cells in the presence and absence of 0.1 μM trametinib (MEKi) or increasing dosages of the pan-TEAD autopalmitoylation inhibitor VT104 (0.1, 0.25, 0.6, 1.6, 4, and 10 μM). Cells were plated in low attachment plates and incubated with each drug for 7 days before cell growth was determined by CellTiterGlo. The data shown are the mean and SEM of three technical replicates. **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed t test. (F) In vitro dose response assay of S-RPN-1 tumor cells with trametinib (MEKi) or the TEAD1-selective inhibitor VT103, pan-TEAD inhibitors VT104 and VT107, and the less-active pan-TEAD inhibitor enantiomer VT106. Cells were plated in 96-well plates and analyzed by CellTiterGlo after 7 days of drug treatment. The data shown are the mean and SEM of three independent biological replicates. (G) IC50 of compounds tested in (B). The data shown are the mean and SEM of the IC50 determined from three independent experiments. ns, not significant. **, P < 0.01 by unpaired two-tailed t test. (H) Allograft tumor growth of S-RPN-1 cells in the flanks of immunocompromised mice ( n = 5 per group). Mice were enrolled in the study when tumor reached >70 mm 3 , after which animals were randomized to the treatment groups indicated. See for dosing details. Data shown are mean ± SEM. ns, not significant. ****, P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with multiple testing correction. (I) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of progress-free survival (PFS) of the mice shown in (D). PFS was defined as a 300% tumor volume increase. **, P < 0.01 by log-rank test. (J) MicroCT imaging of an S-RPN mouse at baseline (left), tumor initiation (middle), and after treatment (right) with VT104/MEKi combination therapy (20 mg/kg VT104 and 0.5 mg/kg trametinib). H, heart. (K) Tumor nodule volume comparison of untreated mice (gray) and two nodules from the mouse shown in (J) (red) over a 2–4 week time period. See also .

Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Western blot confirmation of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown of RIT1, Yap, and cJun. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) Cell proliferation analysis using Incucyte imaging of S-RPN-1 cells with stable knockdown of each gene using the shRNAs indicated. Data shown are the mean ± SEM of three independent transductions. (C) Western blot of Zeb1 expression in S-RPN-1 cells with or without cJun knockdown. Actin was used as a loading control. (D) Western blot quantification of Zeb1 expression in cells after cJun knockdown. Data shown are mean ± SEM of three biological replicates. *, p < 0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t test. (E) Growth-in-low-attachment assay of SALE-RY cells in the presence and absence of 0.1 μM trametinib (MEKi) or increasing dosages of the pan-TEAD autopalmitoylation inhibitor VT104 (0.1, 0.25, 0.6, 1.6, 4, and 10 μM). Cells were plated in low attachment plates and incubated with each drug for 7 days before cell growth was determined by CellTiterGlo. The data shown are the mean and SEM of three technical replicates. **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed t test. (F) In vitro dose response assay of S-RPN-1 tumor cells with trametinib (MEKi) or the TEAD1-selective inhibitor VT103, pan-TEAD inhibitors VT104 and VT107, and the less-active pan-TEAD inhibitor enantiomer VT106. Cells were plated in 96-well plates and analyzed by CellTiterGlo after 7 days of drug treatment. The data shown are the mean and SEM of three independent biological replicates. (G) IC50 of compounds tested in (B). The data shown are the mean and SEM of the IC50 determined from three independent experiments. ns, not significant. **, P < 0.01 by unpaired two-tailed t test. (H) Allograft tumor growth of S-RPN-1 cells in the flanks of immunocompromised mice ( n = 5 per group). Mice were enrolled in the study when tumor reached >70 mm 3 , after which animals were randomized to the treatment groups indicated. See for dosing details. Data shown are mean ± SEM. ns, not significant. ****, P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with multiple testing correction. (I) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of progress-free survival (PFS) of the mice shown in (D). PFS was defined as a 300% tumor volume increase. **, P < 0.01 by log-rank test. (J) MicroCT imaging of an S-RPN mouse at baseline (left), tumor initiation (middle), and after treatment (right) with VT104/MEKi combination therapy (20 mg/kg VT104 and 0.5 mg/kg trametinib). H, heart. (K) Tumor nodule volume comparison of untreated mice (gray) and two nodules from the mouse shown in (J) (red) over a 2–4 week time period. See also .

Techniques Used: Western Blot, shRNA, Knockdown, Control, Imaging, Expressing, Two Tailed Test, Incubation, In Vitro, Comparison

Image Search Results

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Mutant RIT1 cooperates with YAP to drive an EMT-like lung cancer state

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116185

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Growth in low attachment assay of isogenic SALE cells expressing RIT1 M90I and YAP1 8SA alone or in combination analyzed by CellTiterGlo. Data shown are the mean ± SD of 14–16 technical replicates. (B) Heatmap of gene expression data derived from bulk RNA-seq of isogenic SALE cells. Each row is a differentially expressed gene, and each column is a replicate of the cell line variant indicated. The top 100 up- and downregulated genes distinguishing combined RIT1 M90I /YAP1 8SA (RY) cells from YAP1 8SA cells were determined by marker selection based on the mean difference of RY replicates compared to YAP1 8SA replicates and then genes and samples were clustered using one minus Pearson correlation. (C) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq in SALE-RY cells versus parental SALE cells. p values shown were calculated by t tests of three biological replicates per cell line. Multiple hypothesis testing was performed using the false discovery rate (FDR) method. Red points: log 2 fold change (log 2 FC) > 1.5, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.1; blue points: log 2 FC < −1.5, FDR < 0.1. (D) MSigDB overlap analysis of up- and downregulated genes from RNA-seq in RY cells compared to parental. The FDR is the false discovery rate analog of the hypergeometic p value after correction for multiple hypothesis testing. (E) Motif analysis of up- and downregulated genes from (C) using the MSigDB Transcription Factor Target (TFT) gene set. AP-1 and ZEB1 (AREB6) motifs are shown in bold. FDR was calculated as in (D). (F) Western blot of isogenic SALE cells using antibodies against RIT1 and AP-1 transcription factors cJUN and FOSL1/FRA1. Vinculin is used as a loading control. (G) Quantification of biological replicates ( n = 3) of cJUN abundance determined by western blot, normalized to loading control and parental cJUN abundance. Data shown are mean ± SEM. P, parental; R, RIT1 M90I ; Y, YAP1 8SA ; RY, RIT1 M90I/ YAP1 8SA . (H) Quantification of biological replicates ( n = 3) of FRA1 abundance determined by western blot, normalized to loading control and parental FRA1 abundance. Data shown are mean ± SEM. Labeling as in (G). See also and . ns, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed t test.

Article Snippet: cJUN (60A8) , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat #9165; RRID: AB_2130165.

Techniques: Expressing, Gene Expression, Derivative Assay, RNA Sequencing, Variant Assay, Marker, Selection, Western Blot, Control, Labeling, Two Tailed Test

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Mutant RIT1 cooperates with YAP to drive an EMT-like lung cancer state

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116185

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Immunofluorescence and confocal images of SALE cells fixed and stained with anti-YAP and anti-cJUN antibodies and counterstained with DAPI. Scale bar, 100 μm. Inset, 50 μm. (B) Quantification of nuclear YAP fluorescence intensity determined by confocal microscopy. Data shown are mean ± SEM of four biological replicates. P, parental; R, RIT1 M90I ; Y, YAP1 8SA ; RY, RIT1 M90I /YAP1 8SA (C) Quantification of nuclear cJUN fluorescence intensity determined by confocal microscopy. Data shown are mean ± SEM of four biological replicates. Labeling as in (B). (D) Dual p-AP1 luciferase reporter assay in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with control vectors (V), RIT1 M90I (R), or YAP1 WT and YAP1 8SA in the presence or absence of RIT1 M90I . p-RL renilla luciferase was co-transfected and used for normalization. PMA was used as a positive control. Data shown are mean ± SEM of 3 technical replicates. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. (E) Western blot of SALE-RY cells showing doxycycline-regulated induction of cJUN or a dominant-negative cJUN (TAM67). (F) In vivo xenograft tumor growth on doxycycline of the cells shown in (E). Data shown are mean ± SEM of 8–10 tumors per group. * P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA. (G) Tumor weights of tumors shown in (F). Data shown are mean ± SEM. The cJUN wild-type group was not analyzed due to early euthanasia for tumor ulceration. ns, not significant; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed t test unless otherwise specified. See also .

Article Snippet: cJUN (60A8) , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat #9165; RRID: AB_2130165.

Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence, Confocal Microscopy, Labeling, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Transfection, Control, Positive Control, Western Blot, Dominant Negative Mutation, In Vivo, Two Tailed Test

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Mutant RIT1 cooperates with YAP to drive an EMT-like lung cancer state

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116185

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Western blot confirmation of short hairpin RNA (shRNA) knockdown of RIT1, Yap, and cJun. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B) Cell proliferation analysis using Incucyte imaging of S-RPN-1 cells with stable knockdown of each gene using the shRNAs indicated. Data shown are the mean ± SEM of three independent transductions. (C) Western blot of Zeb1 expression in S-RPN-1 cells with or without cJun knockdown. Actin was used as a loading control. (D) Western blot quantification of Zeb1 expression in cells after cJun knockdown. Data shown are mean ± SEM of three biological replicates. *, p < 0.05 by unpaired two-tailed t test. (E) Growth-in-low-attachment assay of SALE-RY cells in the presence and absence of 0.1 μM trametinib (MEKi) or increasing dosages of the pan-TEAD autopalmitoylation inhibitor VT104 (0.1, 0.25, 0.6, 1.6, 4, and 10 μM). Cells were plated in low attachment plates and incubated with each drug for 7 days before cell growth was determined by CellTiterGlo. The data shown are the mean and SEM of three technical replicates. **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001 by unpaired two-tailed t test. (F) In vitro dose response assay of S-RPN-1 tumor cells with trametinib (MEKi) or the TEAD1-selective inhibitor VT103, pan-TEAD inhibitors VT104 and VT107, and the less-active pan-TEAD inhibitor enantiomer VT106. Cells were plated in 96-well plates and analyzed by CellTiterGlo after 7 days of drug treatment. The data shown are the mean and SEM of three independent biological replicates. (G) IC50 of compounds tested in (B). The data shown are the mean and SEM of the IC50 determined from three independent experiments. ns, not significant. **, P < 0.01 by unpaired two-tailed t test. (H) Allograft tumor growth of S-RPN-1 cells in the flanks of immunocompromised mice ( n = 5 per group). Mice were enrolled in the study when tumor reached >70 mm 3 , after which animals were randomized to the treatment groups indicated. See for dosing details. Data shown are mean ± SEM. ns, not significant. ****, P < 0.0001 by one-way ANOVA with multiple testing correction. (I) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of progress-free survival (PFS) of the mice shown in (D). PFS was defined as a 300% tumor volume increase. **, P < 0.01 by log-rank test. (J) MicroCT imaging of an S-RPN mouse at baseline (left), tumor initiation (middle), and after treatment (right) with VT104/MEKi combination therapy (20 mg/kg VT104 and 0.5 mg/kg trametinib). H, heart. (K) Tumor nodule volume comparison of untreated mice (gray) and two nodules from the mouse shown in (J) (red) over a 2–4 week time period. See also .

Article Snippet: cJUN (60A8) , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat #9165; RRID: AB_2130165.

Techniques: Western Blot, shRNA, Knockdown, Control, Imaging, Expressing, Two Tailed Test, Incubation, In Vitro, Comparison

Expression of JUNB correlates to poor overall survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Kaplan-Meyer curves of the overall survival in the total cohort depending on ( A ) Low (n = 481) or high expression (n = 208) of cJUN (p = 0.127), and ( B ) low (n = 530) or high expression (n = 170) of JUNB are shown (p = 0.006).

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: The AP-1 factor JUNB correlates with poor survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07393-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Expression of JUNB correlates to poor overall survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Kaplan-Meyer curves of the overall survival in the total cohort depending on ( A ) Low (n = 481) or high expression (n = 208) of cJUN (p = 0.127), and ( B ) low (n = 530) or high expression (n = 170) of JUNB are shown (p = 0.006).

Article Snippet: Immunohistochemical staining for cJUN and JUNB was carried out using the Leica Bond-MAX automated system (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). cJUN (cJUN (60A8) Rabbit mAB #9165, Cell Signaling Technologies, 1:250 dilution) and JUNB (JUNB (C37F9) Rabbit mAB #3753, Cell Signaling Technologies, 1:250 dilution) staining was performed.

Techniques: Expressing

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cJUN and JUNB in esophageal adenocarcinoma. In total, 735 patient samples were stained for cJUN and JUNB. Representative immunohistochemistry pictures are shown: Top, cJUN IHC for a positive (left) and a negative sample (right). Bottom, JUNB IHC for a positive (left) and a negative sample (right). Magnification 20X.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: The AP-1 factor JUNB correlates with poor survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07393-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of cJUN and JUNB in esophageal adenocarcinoma. In total, 735 patient samples were stained for cJUN and JUNB. Representative immunohistochemistry pictures are shown: Top, cJUN IHC for a positive (left) and a negative sample (right). Bottom, JUNB IHC for a positive (left) and a negative sample (right). Magnification 20X.

Techniques: Immunohistochemistry, Staining

JUNB expression is a marker for poor outcome in patients with multimodal therapy. Survival analysis for the multimodally-treated patients using Kaplan-Meyer curves . ( A ) Low (n = 318) or high expression (n = 147) of cJUN (p = 0.078), and ( B ) low (n = 367) or high expression (n = 112) of JUNB is shown (p = 0.006).

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: The AP-1 factor JUNB correlates with poor survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07393-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: JUNB expression is a marker for poor outcome in patients with multimodal therapy. Survival analysis for the multimodally-treated patients using Kaplan-Meyer curves . ( A ) Low (n = 318) or high expression (n = 147) of cJUN (p = 0.078), and ( B ) low (n = 367) or high expression (n = 112) of JUNB is shown (p = 0.006).

Techniques: Expressing, Marker

The combined expression of cJUN and JUNB correlates to the poorest outcome in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Survival analysis for the combined expression of cJUN and JUNB compared to either one of the two factors positive or none at all. ( A ) Overall cohort, negative (n = 370), cJUN or JUNB positive (n = 217) as well as cJUN and JUNB positive (n = 66) expression is shown (p = 0.012). ( B ) Primary surgery, negative (n = 123), cJUN or JUNB positive (n = 66) as well as cJUN and JUNB positive (n = 22) expression is shown (p = 0.774). ( C ) Multimodally-treated cohort, negative (n = 247), cJUN or JUNB positive (n = 44) as wells as cJUN and JUNB positive (n = 66) expression is shown (p = 0.003).

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: The AP-1 factor JUNB correlates with poor survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07393-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: The combined expression of cJUN and JUNB correlates to the poorest outcome in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Survival analysis for the combined expression of cJUN and JUNB compared to either one of the two factors positive or none at all. ( A ) Overall cohort, negative (n = 370), cJUN or JUNB positive (n = 217) as well as cJUN and JUNB positive (n = 66) expression is shown (p = 0.012). ( B ) Primary surgery, negative (n = 123), cJUN or JUNB positive (n = 66) as well as cJUN and JUNB positive (n = 22) expression is shown (p = 0.774). ( C ) Multimodally-treated cohort, negative (n = 247), cJUN or JUNB positive (n = 44) as wells as cJUN and JUNB positive (n = 66) expression is shown (p = 0.003).

Techniques: Expressing

Review

Structured Review

Images

1) Product Images from "Mutant RIT1 cooperates with YAP to drive an EMT-like lung cancer state"

Similar Products

Image Search Results